What Investors Don't Get about Google [GOOG]

Google fell sharply on Q1 earnings, mostly due to an ad revenue shortfall. We think investors are missing the bigger picture.

Q1 Headwinds Drive GOOG Down Sharply
Alphabet's stock fell sharply on Q1 results, due primarily to ad revenue growing "only" +17% (vs. expectations of +19%).
Investors seemed shocked by the slowdown. Management cited negative impacts from currency fluctuations, timing of ad product changes, and a stagnating global smartphone market. But investors didn't seem to buy it.
How does Q1 impact the long-term thesis for Google's stock, and is the stock price undervaluing that thesis?
Our take:
Google is deliberately building its business slowly, bypassing revenue it could be making so it can drive more viewers
The near-term ad sales slowdown was self-inflicted (e.g. changes at YouTube's recommendation engine), not a structural problem for GOOG
The "slowing growth" narrative has created a dislocation in the stock, which is now dramatically undervaluing the company for long-term investors
What Investors Are Missing: Slow and Steady is Better
Here's what investors are thinking:
Ad revenue grew +17% in Q1, the first time Google has grown less than 20% since 1Q 2015 and lower than investors' +19% estimates
Increasing ad competition (AMZN, FB) could be weakening Google's moat and forcing it into a "new normal" of slower growth
We disagree -- here's our take:
Much of the growth slowdown in Q1 was self-inflicted (e.g. changes to YouTube's recommendation engine)
Competitors like Amazon probably did play a role, but not to the extent many investors seem to think
The hardware team at Google also had some difficulties given a stagnating global smartphone market
Management's transparency around YouTube could definitely improve -- we hope to see changes here soon
Putting aside Q1 results, Google is deliberately building its business slowly, bypassing revenue it could be making so it can drive more scale first.
It could be making much more money off of YouTube, for example, but is optimizing for viewership growth. Yet the market seems to be penalizing Google for the recent ad slowdown, plus bets that are costing money today but could pay off in the future.
Which brings us to valuation.
The Right Way to Value GOOG
In 2017, one of our favorite investors, Bill Nygren who runs the successful Oakmark fund, did an analysis on what Google's true valuation was.
Today, GOOG's headline P/E ratio is 25x. It would be very easy to stop right there and say, yes, Alphabet is a great company but everyone knows it, hence it trades at a premium.
We think that take is wrong.
This headline P/E ratio is based on "GAAP earnings." GAAP earnings are a metric that makes life easier to compare stocks like Google, Coca-Cola, and McDonalds on an apples-to-apples basis. Or so people think.
The problem is, traditional GAAP accounting does not accurately reflect a modern software/services company like Alphabet. It misses a number of critical adjustments and unfairly penalizes Alphabet for the deliberate strategic decisions it's made to maximize long-term shareholder value. Not to mention its diverse businesses.
For example, advertising is an incredibly high margin business, while YouTube is likely closer to breakeven and Waymo is losing billions as it has no revenues currently. What's the right P/E ratio for GOOG when you lump all its complex businesses together? Most people don't do the math.
Here's a crack at the true valuation math for GOOG:
Thanks to our friends over at HardCore Value, a financial blog, who did this analysis to more accurately reflect the accounting for a modern company like Alphabet. They ascribe $125B value to YouTube and $70B value to Waymo (below the estimated $160B-220B and $75B-110B valuations from firms like Morgan Stanley and Evercore), plus some other adjustments.
Putting It All Together: GOOG Trades at ~14x P/E
Based on the analysis above, we believe GOOG is actually valued at only ~14x 2019 P/E once you adjust for various factors that the market is missing. The S&P 500 is valued at ~17x 2019 P/E today.
That makes GOOG -- one of (if not THE) best businesses in the world -- cheaper than the average U.S. company.
We'll leave you with one of Bill Nygren's famous remarks on Google:
"I've read a lot of arguments about the multiple the Google business deserves, but not once has it been below-market […until now]."
Apr. 30th, 2019
Share
As of this writing, GOOG was a portfolio holding of Titan Invest. This security may cease to be a portfolio holding at some point in the future.
The statements, opinions and analyses presented herein generally are provided as general information. Opinions, estimates and probabilities expressed in Titan research constitute the judgment of the author as of the date indicated and are subject to change without notice. While all the information prepared in the foregoing articles is believed to be accurate, Titan Invest (“Titan”) makes no express guarantee as to the completeness or accuracy of, nor can it accept any responsibility for errors appearing in, the foregoing articles. Other events which were not taken into account may occur, and any projections, outlooks or assumptions should not be construed to be indicative of the actual events which will occur. The information contained herein is not, and should not be construed as, an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. In addition, nothing contained herein is intended to be, nor shall it be construed as, investment advice, nor is it to be relied upon in making any investment or other decision. While Titan is a federally registered investment adviser, the information presented is not part of the personalized, proprietary algorithmic based investment advice provided by Titan to its advisory clients. Rather, the information presented constitutes educational and informational materials meant to better inform market participants, including, without limitation, current and potential advisory clients of Titan. Prior to making any investment decision, you are advised to consult with your broker, investment adviser, or other appropriate tax or financial professional to determine the suitability of any investment. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy discussed herein will be profitable or equal any historical performance level(s). Neither Titan, any of its affiliates, nor each of their respective officers, directors, members, agents, representatives, employees, or contractors (collectively, “Titan Parties”), shall be responsible or have any liability for investment decisions based upon, or the results obtained from, the information provided herein. You assume all risks of loss resulting, directly or indirectly, from the use of the information contained in the foregoing articles. By accepting receipt of the foregoing articles you acknowledge and agree to hold harmless the Titan Parties from any and all claims, actions, damages, losses, liabilities, costs and expenses of any kind whatsoever, including but not limited to any claims of negligence, arising out of, resulting from, by reason of, or in connection with the use of the information contained in the foregoing articles. Securities laws impose liabilities under certain circumstances on persons who act in good faith, and therefore no portion of the above shall constitute a waiver or limitation of any rights you may have under any federal or state securities laws.
Certain articles discuss historical performance of a particular issuer over a limited period of time. The historical performance discussed in such articles represents gross performance of the issuer over the limited period of time depicted, and is not indicative of any actual portfolio or investment returns of any account. Any such returns, even if an account was invested in the security discussed over the limited period of time depicted, would be reduced by fees and expenses paid by any such account. The foregoing articles contains certain “forward-looking statements,” which may be identified by the use of such words as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “estimated,” “potential” and other similar terms. Examples of forward-looking statements include, without limitation, estimates with respect to financial condition, market developments, and the success or lack of success of particular investments (and may include such words as “crash” or “collapse”). All are subject to various factors, including, without limitation, general and local economic conditions, changing levels of competition within certain industries and markets, changes in interest rates, changes in legislation or regulation, and other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technological factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from projected results. Comparable companies, strategies, portfolios and indices may be included in the foregoing articles only as a context reflecting general market results during the depicted period or as of the specified date. The comparison of any company, strategy, portfolio or index to a single other company, strategy, portfolio or index may be inappropriate because the relevant assets, strategies and level of risk may vary materially from the comparable company, strategy, portfolio or index as a whole. Titan uses a proprietary algorithmic strategy in selecting recommendations to advisory clients. Issuers and/or securities discussed herein may be, and often are, held by clients of Titan in their investment portfolios. Any single security or issuer identified in herein will not represent all of the securities purchased, sold or recommended for advisory clients of Titan. Please see Titan’s website and Program Brochure for more details on security selection for advisory clients. Before investing, consider your investment objectives as certain investments are not suitable for all investors. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
© Copyright 2018 Whisker Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved.