Q1 Headwinds Drive GOOG Down Sharply
Alphabet's stock fell sharply on Q1 results, due primarily to ad revenue growing "only" +17% (vs. expectations of +19%).
Investors seemed shocked by the slowdown. Management cited negative impacts from currency fluctuations, timing of ad product changes, and a stagnating global smartphone market. But investors didn't seem to buy it.
How does Q1 impact the long-term thesis for Google's stock, and is the stock price undervaluing that thesis?
Google is deliberately building its business slowly, bypassing revenue it could be making so it can drive more viewers
The near-term ad sales slowdown was self-inflicted (e.g. changes at YouTube's recommendation engine), not a structural problem for GOOG
The "slowing growth" narrative has created a dislocation in the stock, which is now dramatically undervaluing the company for long-term investors
What Investors Are Missing: Slow and Steady is Better
Here's what investors are thinking:
Ad revenue grew +17% in Q1, the first time Google has grown less than 20% since 1Q 2015 and lower than investors' +19% estimates
Increasing ad competition (AMZN, FB) could be weakening Google's moat and forcing it into a "new normal" of slower growth
We disagree -- here's our take:
Much of the growth slowdown in Q1 was self-inflicted (e.g. changes to YouTube's recommendation engine)
Competitors like Amazon probably did play a role, but not to the extent many investors seem to think
The hardware team at Google also had some difficulties given a stagnating global smartphone market
Management's transparency around YouTube could definitely improve -- we hope to see changes here soon
Putting aside Q1 results, Google is deliberately building its business slowly, bypassing revenue it could be making so it can drive more scale first.
It could be making much more money off of YouTube, for example, but is optimizing for viewership growth. Yet the market seems to be penalizing Google for the recent ad slowdown, plus bets that are costing money today but could pay off in the future.
Which brings us to valuation.
The Right Way to Value GOOG
In 2017, one of our favorite investors, Bill Nygren who runs the successful Oakmark fund, did an analysis on what Google's true valuation was.
Today, GOOG's headline P/E ratio is 25x. It would be very easy to stop right there and say, yes, Alphabet is a great company but everyone knows it, hence it trades at a premium.
We think that take is wrong.
This headline P/E ratio is based on "GAAP earnings." GAAP earnings are a metric that makes life easier to compare stocks like Google, Coca-Cola, and McDonalds on an apples-to-apples basis. Or so people think.
The problem is, traditional GAAP accounting does not accurately reflect a modern software/services company like Alphabet. It misses a number of critical adjustments and unfairly penalizes Alphabet for the deliberate strategic decisions it's made to maximize long-term shareholder value. Not to mention its diverse businesses.
For example, advertising is an incredibly high margin business, while YouTube is likely closer to breakeven and Waymo is losing billions as it has no revenues currently. What's the right P/E ratio for GOOG when you lump all its complex businesses together? Most people don't do the math.
Here's a crack at the true valuation math for GOOG:
Thanks to our friends over at HardCore Value, a financial blog, who did this analysis to more accurately reflect the accounting for a modern company like Alphabet. They ascribe $125B value to YouTube and $70B value to Waymo (below the estimated $160B-220B and $75B-110B valuations from firms like Morgan Stanley and Evercore), plus some other adjustments.
Putting It All Together: GOOG Trades at ~14x P/E
Based on the analysis above, we believe GOOG is actually valued at only ~14x 2019 P/E once you adjust for various factors that the market is missing. The S&P 500 is valued at ~17x 2019 P/E today.
That makes GOOG -- one of (if not THE) best businesses in the world -- cheaper than the average U.S. company.
We'll leave you with one of Bill Nygren's famous remarks on Google:
"I've read a lot of arguments about the multiple the Google business deserves, but not once has it been below-market […until now]."